Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

CENSORSHIP OF FILMS

MINISTER’S RBPLV EDUCATION BOARDS N<fl, SATISFIED

Agreeing with the Wanganui Ed*#* ; tion Board that the reply of th* . ter of Education (the Hon. V-r[ Mason) to its request for »«*Jgf censorship of films was unMtilftrt®?' the Canterbury Education . BMW JF ; terday decided to approach the ter again on this subject, . \ The letter from the Wanganui boara stated that the Minister had replied « the most recent representations_W W j lows; —“Since the Education Depin* : ment last wrote to you on this iuoJbj \ the censorship of films for children nilt been given further consideration BIW P t is hoped that something further iw j be dope to discourage children IWg j seeing unsuitable films. I apprWW'* ) very much the interest that your MIW j is taking in the moral welfare or w*; children of New Zealand, and hop# WJ the publicity which has been given w; the question through your efforts wtu -j be the means of encouraging pared*j to take their responsibilities more WU* ] ously,” The Wanganui board felt;tn« >■ this reply did.not give promise 01 any ■ adequate action to deal with this pron* lem, and it considered that the should be discussed at the next con* ference of boards and followed w strong representations to the Minister by deputation. „ “That is all very well, but the next conference may not be for 12 or more. We, should act now, saw Mr C. S. Thompson. ... , Mr W. T. Langley commented that in an earlier reply the Minister had sain the responsibility was the parents. T« difficulty was that now in many cast* both parents were working, even .., the evenings, and sometimes the cnu* dren were given sixpence to go to tJW pictures. There were many k nO T; cases of children being found asleep “* the picture theatres. . . Mr Thompson: Not much harm is Mj ing done if they are asleep. (Laughter.' He moved that the board express. l * dissatisfaction with the reply and ttw a committee be set up to draft a repu setting out the board's opinions. In subsequent discussion Mr Lanj* ley expressed the view that children under 14 should be prohibited from s'* tending picture shows at night, W. 8 Mr A. McNeil the opinion that CB“' dren should be prohibiteSßrom seeini films recommended by Wk,censor w suitable only for adults. . The framing of the further letter w the Minister was left in the bands n* 1 the chairman (Mr S. Smith), Mr I Neil, and the secretary (Mr I* I Rowley). - I

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19420919.2.43

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume LXXVIII, Issue 23747, 19 September 1942, Page 4

Word Count
417

CENSORSHIP OF FILMS Press, Volume LXXVIII, Issue 23747, 19 September 1942, Page 4

CENSORSHIP OF FILMS Press, Volume LXXVIII, Issue 23747, 19 September 1942, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert