Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SPRING TIDES AT SUMNER

Sir,—My definite opinion, based on observation, is that the closing of McCormack’s Bay by means of the causeway rpafl is directly, responsible for the erosion Of north spit. It interfered with the scour of a vast quantity of water, which had the effect of a cushion on the Heathcote river. The wall constructed directed the flow of the river straight at the north spit, weak: enihg the sandhills until eventually they gave why from the point in line With 1h» catiifWiy row. The sand wa» washed oygr to the Oavg Bock add Bier, and 1 in rtif opinion 16 thgts to übd*r Oondittyns.rW 1. SINCLAIR. Lyttfltqn, June 1?. I$4L ‘

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19410623.2.80.3

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume LXXVII, Issue 23362, 23 June 1941, Page 9

Word Count
113

SPRING TIDES AT SUMNER Press, Volume LXXVII, Issue 23362, 23 June 1941, Page 9

SPRING TIDES AT SUMNER Press, Volume LXXVII, Issue 23362, 23 June 1941, Page 9

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert