MEDICAL PRACTITIONER SCHEME
' Sir, —There has been much controvV.ersy in your columns of late on the T above question, Socialists in particular to point to the doctor as the culprit who won’t give him attention “free.” The Social;vlst*fry are; all in the rush when they jV'thlhk something is free, but in this, i case tee,,/free” is a misnomer. * I V Leading finance out of the question ci&r'tee-moment, can 1 anyone who-sin-“'cerely CWuMders whafthe patfel system Kteeans. When it opens tee road to panel ; service,' to newly-qualified doctors, ojtf'of university?- At'the local >iho«l>itahXOhn.‘ sees, young house surIsSedoa practising theirprofesslon under iteev guidance of the s specialists. They SUB telework' ip voj^maw^time^fqr years; then, having . fitted vfot.thq higher 'honours, to England.or. Scotland, and Now,
lead to a medical standard in New Zealand equal to panel limits. —Yours, etc C. SMITH. March 31, 1941..
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19410403.2.73.7
Bibliographic details
Press, Volume LXXVII, Issue 23295, 3 April 1941, Page 10
Word Count
141MEDICAL PRACTITIONER SCHEME Press, Volume LXXVII, Issue 23295, 3 April 1941, Page 10
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Press. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Christchurch City Libraries.
Log in