Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

UNEMPLOYMENT

so tn bditob or in pbbhs. Sir, —In'.a statement issued recently, 'Mr Armstrong admitted that those who Were receiving award rates of pay, subsidised out of the unemployment funds, were not classed as unemployed for the purpose of the Abstract of Statistics. . 1

Part 4 of .the Declaration; of Industrial and Occupational Status reads, “If unemployed,, are you in receipt of sustenance or employed on Scheme 5? (Answer “Yes” or “No”; if in employment write “X.”)” In the month of June ( 1930, there were 15,456 under No. S scheme. (rational work), and X now

appeal to the contributors of this page to enlighten me as to the number now employed under No. 5 scheme, and why they do not receive award rates of pay.—Yours, etc., SORE. May 27, 1938,

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19380530.2.20.4

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume LXXIV, Issue 22414, 30 May 1938, Page 5

Word Count
130

UNEMPLOYMENT Press, Volume LXXIV, Issue 22414, 30 May 1938, Page 5

UNEMPLOYMENT Press, Volume LXXIV, Issue 22414, 30 May 1938, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert