Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

A LESSON' FROM CHINA

TO THE EDITOR OF THE PRESS. Sir, —Could you find space to give your Christian writers a lesson from China? Perhaps it would do them good. In the early years of the reign of the great Emperor Kam-hi, a mandarin of the city of Canton heard from his house a great noise, which proceeded from the next house. He inquired if anybody was being killed and was told that the almoner of the Danish missionary society, a chaplain from Batavia, and a Jesuit were disputing. He had them brought to' his house, put tea and sweets before them, and asked why they quarrelled. The Jesuit replied that it was very painful for him, since he was always right, to have, to do with men who were always wrong; that he had at first argued with the greatest restraint, but had at length lost patience. The mandarin, with the utmost discretion, reminded them that politeness was needed in all discussion, told them that in China men never became angry, and asked the cause of the dispute.

The Jesuit answered: “My lord, I leave it to you to decide. These two gentlemen refuse to submit to the decrees of the Council of Trent.” “I am astonished," said the mandarin. Then, turning to the refractory pair, he said: “Gentlemen, you ought to respect the opinions of a large gathering. I do not know what the Council of Trent is, but a number of men are always better informed than a single one. No one ought to imagine that he is better than others and has a monopoly of reason. So our great Confucius teaches; and, believe me, you will do well to submit to the Council of Trent.”

The Dane 1 then ■ spoke. “My lord speaks with the greatest wisdom,” he said. “We respect great councils, as is proper, and therefore we are in entire agreement. with several that were held before the Council of Trent.” ■ “Oh, if that w, the case,” said the mandarin, “I beg your parden. You may -be right. So you and this Dutchman are. of the same opinion, against this' poor Jesuit?’ “Not a bit,” said the Dutchman. “This fellow’s opinions are almost as extravagant as tho'se ’ of the Jesuit yonder, who has been so very amiable to you. I can’t bear them.” “I don’t understand,” said the mandarin. “Are you not all three Christian's? Have you not all three come to teach Christianity m our Empire? Ought you not. therefore, to hold the .same dogmas?” “It is this way, my lord,” said the Jesuit, “These two are mortal enemies, and are both against me. Hence it is clear that they are both wrong, and I am right.” “That is not quite clear,” said the mandarin. “Strictly speaking, all three of you may be wrong. I should like

to hear you all, one after the other.” The Jesuit then made a rather long speech, during which the Dane and the Dutchman shrugged their shoulders. The mandarin did not understand a word of it. Then the Dane • spoke; the two. opponents regarded- each other with pity, and the mandarin again failed to- understand. The Dutchman had the same effect. In the end they all spoke together and abused each other roundly. The good mandarin secured silence with great difficulty and said, “If you want us to tolerate your teaching here, begin by being yourselves neither intolerant nor intolerable.”

When they went out the Jesuit met a Dominican friar and told him that he had v/on, adding that truth 'al-: ways triumphed. The Dominican said: “Had I been there, ypu would not have won; I should have convicted you of lying and idolatry.” The. quarrel became warm, and the Jesuit and! Dominican took to pulling each other’s hair. The mandarin, hearing of the scandal, sent them both to 'prison.' A sub-mandarin said to the judge “How long, does your excellency wish them to be 1 kept in prison?” “Until they agree,” said the judge. “Then,” said the sub-mandarin, “they are in prison; for life.” “In that case,” said the judge,, “until they forgive each ether.” “They will never forgive each other,” said' the other; “I know them.” “Then,” said the mandarin, “let them stop there until they pretend to 'forgiveeach other,”—Yours, etc., WITH CARE.

March 18, 1938

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19380319.2.146.6

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume LXXIV, Issue 22355, 19 March 1938, Page 22

Word Count
721

A LESSON' FROM CHINA Press, Volume LXXIV, Issue 22355, 19 March 1938, Page 22

A LESSON' FROM CHINA Press, Volume LXXIV, Issue 22355, 19 March 1938, Page 22

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert