Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

INCOME TAX DUE NEXT MONTH

INCREASES OVER OF FORMER YEARSV , CLASSES MOST AFFECTBDV ;

A few months ago citizens ."siAb U are fortunate, or uhfortunate,.enbufn jl to be assessed for ■ income M official notice sent to them showing. M how much the State would require ■ from them under this heading. Notj ■ that the time for payment is within-, i a few weeks; many taxpayers.Jae,; 1 scanning these warning document 1 again a little more" closely. - £* || Assuming that such calculations | as 31-113ths of a penny by 161 have been, correctly reduced M to fact by the department (and most I taxpayers will gladly give it - ««" | benefit of the doubt), the general. a|>. I pression gained is that the mcreasfe.' | over the previous year's figures iaS- I been startlingly large. " ' I Most citizens, though I any marked increase, in' theif &" | comes, were prepared for a substanv | tial increase in the tax levied^JW.l them, but they were hardly prfeteW^K to find it more than doubled, ari<V% ; | some cases even trebled. Yet this Iggi been the result in a very largeT»am- ? *| Iber of cases; and it is upon u&Jßftl I comes ranging from £3OO tojgM , that the new rates fali most nea^-fl |This arises chiefly from the l in the initial rate on. incomes «|| £2lO, from 7d in the pound-to »{■ Bd. almost treble. It is in the. «;< j ■ come taxpayers favour that the elL^I emptions of £2lO and of *s°*wk| wife whose income does not I £6O remain constant and ™^JESV| gradually disappear'with i^ o *"!^! income as they used to do. of this is that in a few rare mail's tax may be slightly less ttg»g| it was under the old scale. On wiy other hand a taxpayer now reCeW^i no exemption for the sums he a&™J contribute to the unemploymp^ Most hardly hit of all is the *£ with an unearned income, for IBrate is a third higher than tß* levied on earned income. As waclearly pointed out at the time, »- strange anbmaly of the new that oh the higher incomes, say A®?;; £BOO upward, the rate of i nc ™?£j'. and in some cases even the acnw» cash increase, is much higher than» ? is on the lower incomes. The averr f age man, therefore, will just havew; find what consolation he can W =»■* further proof that he is the backbon?| of the country, and pay up.wwnj the due date comes round, h!s comments for a future oppor-| tunity. . -<■.!

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19370111.2.50

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume LXXIII, Issue 21987, 11 January 1937, Page 8

Word Count
404

INCOME TAX DUE NEXT MONTH Press, Volume LXXIII, Issue 21987, 11 January 1937, Page 8

INCOME TAX DUE NEXT MONTH Press, Volume LXXIII, Issue 21987, 11 January 1937, Page 8

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert