Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

IRELAND: A POLITICAL ANALYSIS

TO THE EDITOR OE THE PRESS., Sir, —The reviewer of “Facing the Irish Question” writes: "‘X’ has made the unwarrantable assumption that an outline of Mr Armour’s views . , , . implies approval of them.” Perhaps it would be more correct to say that I definitely hold the opinion that such is a fact. Your reviewer in effect says that the “assumption” is untrue; otherwise his use of the word “unwarranted” would be merely intended to confuse. We clearly want an umpire to decide which of us is right, and Miss Mackay, quite unintentionally, comes along, wishing to support what she considers, to be the opinions of the reviewer, and giving the verdict in my favour. Shall we leave it at that? — Yours, etc., X. March 3. 1936,

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19360307.2.139

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume LXXII, Issue 21726, 7 March 1936, Page 19

Word Count
129

IRELAND: A POLITICAL ANALYSIS Press, Volume LXXII, Issue 21726, 7 March 1936, Page 19

IRELAND: A POLITICAL ANALYSIS Press, Volume LXXII, Issue 21726, 7 March 1936, Page 19

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert