LABOUR AND LYTTELTON

Press, Volume LXXI, Issue 21512, 29 June 1935, Page 22

LABOUR AND LYTTELTON

to rur, unirott of run put:'* Sir, —I looked in "The Press" this morniw: (Friday) to ses if Labour had anything to say to the strictures passed the previous day on Mr Archer's tlamboyant eulogy of Mr 1. MeCor.it).- n was not there. Labour was dumb, as usual, and people \vu! behove was dumb because it could not rcpiy. But this is the particular point 1 would like to make. Wo are almo.i certain to hear from I .about- durin:; the coming campaign chaises that tne local press is so prejudiced that it o/ill not five Labour a fair . hance or nearin;.:,. J Where is th ~ urnairness. I as,v: T am sure your columns are open to Labour to reply to any criticism and ;;t a te it< : ("ise. If it doe-i not choose -o do that, the fault is Labour's not '.'ihe Press's." The old silly ;<a:; aneut "anonymous correspondents is .vale and ineffective, Nobody believe-; th:.. Labour refuses to reply for a' 1 :/ otnpr reason Shan that it cannot Hleivively do so.—Yours, etc., f *3 v rv-o t'.'l Ain . June THE LYTTELTON ELECTION HJ I'FIK 1-1 'l 1 '''- 1 °'• ' ' 1 Sir, —Evidently thf Lyttelfon election will proceed on different lines from previous election.".. One candidate represents cultuiv, me otlkr a.';i|culture. II is well to oe ao!e to !00.. at eleetionecrim; from various points of 'view. Yours, etc., s r 'i^ T June 27, lMa.