Letters to The Editor

Press, Volume LXX, Issue 21133, 7 April 1934, Page 9

Letters to The Editor

Correspondents "'lk. do not comply with our rule- set "ill in Hie last column «if our leader l'"- 1 -' "ill cxcu.sh us from notii;injr ■ lin'ir letters. .K.A-: 'Hint rojicapoiulnnce jf closed. J[. Al' lr ".-;<" : Your riuciy will be an.v.venl in ill" "Buildinj Notes. Jiorrilicfl. When your question ~-n.s referrcd to n prominent Christclun-oh , hemisi, he said Hint the allegations ,„ii.lf were absolutely ridiculous. ,\ll pe'ent medicines (in Hie jlinrket were regularly o.'.aniined by the Health I),-ji.n-lrnent (mil even if a manufar I urer m ijh'-<l I" do mi it would he inipns ruble for him to put such things into hii- i>ri)dii'ili'."i«. The .matter iva.-, raised in the Jtou.sc of Representative* „„ September -J:!, in:s2, when Mr W. 1". r,;irn;ird asked the .Minister f or Jle-illh (the Him. •!. A. Youn-) to prohibit the sab- of the medicine referred in if the allesniions were true. The Minl.ler said that he could give a complete denial to the allegations made ronei-rnine the medicine. An invesliiration had been made by the. Health l>cpiirlment and it. had been found that the preparation contained no Mich, injredicnts as sussosted.