Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image

The difference of opinion existing between the opposite sexes about the value of women's apparel was well illustrated in the Magistrate's Court in Wellington recently during the hearing of a case in which theft was alleged. Asked what value she placed on a cape, which she stated had belonged to her and she had missed, a witness for the police said that it was part of an imported frock, and was worth £2. Counsel for one of the defendants said, "A man would say it was worth about Is." Mr J. S. Barton, S.M., remarked that if a man had any knowledge of the subject concerned, he would know that the cost was in inverse proportion to the amount of material in a garment.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19331201.2.16.4

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume LXIX, Issue 21027, 1 December 1933, Page 3

Word Count
124

Page 3 Advertisements Column 4 Press, Volume LXIX, Issue 21027, 1 December 1933, Page 3

Page 3 Advertisements Column 4 Press, Volume LXIX, Issue 21027, 1 December 1933, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert