SALES TAX BILL.

Press, Volume LXIX, Issue 20790, 25 February 1933, Page 14

SALES TAX BILL.

DEBATE IN BOARD TO DECIOK (rii*sa AsuooiATrar WELLINGTON, The Legislative Gwaeii la moving the second gales Tax Bill, tb« Hon. Si* eaid he thought it up a misconception ttißf mH| p. result of raising the without the costs of th« the estimated deficit for £6,100,000, and the extra t«nSH| Tbo Hon. Sir James A'faft itlifl agreed with the but asked whether tfca 1 ' would consider setting ep m ent tribunal to mafea legislation instead or merco had made the such a provision wu is tW 4gufl||| Act _ the Government g|iqtg||^nH|| timber industry, which ing difficult times, 6# j|ES™| from the tax, and he *W"«gs§jgla imposition of a Ux of 24 >'mßM crude oil. Such a something like_ was unfortunate thai had imposed a aew <en» <£«aH| which was causing amongst the business would have been better fca a 5 per cent, primage. 4m9HHH extra 5 per cast, en The Hon. E. Masters 'he had met had offered to the Government in eeßew9iH||HM The Government had |pB|MW ita exemptions!, and had been given to pass on to the Mi»is|er suggestion that a btvi up with power t* 4tctdeV «nHH raised under the legiihliwfc l flMB| bar industry had alreaip WHH not thought i% would tax. If a tax #i fl* rfMB imposed on. erode a®sji|BmemHH paniea would be ftaxnl £sra£yH9Hß daily. The attitada MgHtan men had been maialy the .decision of the a|liaiMg||^HM The BiH was wad a «rifljnfljj| quickly put thrvagh '-SnHIHHn stages, and passed. The Council rest at