NEW ZEALAND AND AUSTRALIA'S INTERDEPENDENCE.
i j'< Sir.—The recent interview with Mr i, J looiaf Buxton about embargoes on \ '. uit and potatoes between Australia I • d New Zealand was extremely inter- ',"' ting and recalled incidents during my * jonra ia Sydney three years ago. $| J its toe* were then selling at £23 a '■it j , e n and a number of street petitions IS I .'to being signed by the citizens ask- '* '■ •: z for the entry of New Zealand •- * • rtfitoes. It struck me then how "'iiculous it was that we as neighbours ', odd act like peevish children. New Zealand and Australia need each - ber's help in a very definite way. Both * ' .uutries are dangerously under popu- ** ted; both countries depend upon the ' ; otection of Great Britain without '■ anting to pay for that protection; both , untriesjhave, great unused seaboards; * ' ith countries are well supplied with mn-rous pettifogging squealers who ivp more noise than sense; both council have "slobbered" farmers with v ' *n«n« that has led to their undoing; . >th countries would spend their grandnldren"s heritage to put a railway into '• "•« Xever-Never. We are brothers in ' " «»3d and we are loaded with the same * * upidities, yet geography determines .if we must stick to each other, what<T our affection for the Mother Counr is. and 1 do not wish to belittle it. -, - V should stand shoulder to shoulder -, ith Australia and help her in every ' /-» * tr we can, because our future is mparablv bound up with hers. ** W« thould institute special clearing - **.. -.um-s wherebv the trade of each couu- " -r muftt balance. If goods and services iv for goods and services there is every •juoa why the entry of goods into each mntrv should be absolutely free of aty. * The industries of each country »uld be safeguarded in the following • aaner. The sectional parts could be ,-= I ade to balance. Thus in farm pro- * "■ - \*te fruits could balance potatoes, Aus- » - f-alian manufactured woollens arid light . "-, i orrteds might balance New Zealand /„ - "ianketß. Australian light boots might " ; .'*lan<"e New Zealand heavies and so 'a. Neither country would dominate '.* .'• to other. Each would supplement the ■"-• '-Ji*r- The. secondary industries of . tistrtHa have just saved that country ~,;■' ; rot devastating ruin. But ordinary • i '■'- rote<:tiott can be as senseless in opera- ' ". «tu free trade. It is preventing ' .'*•* -gttralia and New Zealand from help- '■ i- * »g eaeh other at a time when we should •"■- —edotef mt utmost to strengthen each V f Her. If we set up a department to ' ;' ' e*'*3*P equated trade with Australia, I -.f - believe the trade would multiply by ; ,» vm in a »hort time. But on top of ■ -■'• uite ifeould develop a mercantile ' »■■;.. Urine which should act as the bacic--1 ': i- '4«89 of o»r iiland defences. , 's* >S Sooner m later our public men must <r *j *'*itte «» t* the fact that Australia and * S <U l-ew Zealand are not . enemies but Pi' ■ tartem who need each other's help • ' !.* -l January 1«, 1933. i,f ' -S I i ' W ' ,
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19330117.2.98.1
Bibliographic details
Press, Volume LXIX, Issue 20756, 17 January 1933, Page 12
Word Count
493NEW ZEALAND AND AUSTRALIA'S INTERDEPENDENCE. Press, Volume LXIX, Issue 20756, 17 January 1933, Page 12
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Press. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Christchurch City Libraries.