Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

ARE BOYS BETTER FOR A WASH?

ETON HEAD'S DOUBTS. Most English people are -very doubtful- whether all the reforms and changes in education have made them very much wiser than they were before, declared Dr. C. A. Alington, the headmaster of Eton, in addressing, as' its president, the Eton, Slough, and Windsor branch of the Workers' Educational Association at Eton College last month. For instance, it was very difficult to maintain that boys were very much healthier than in the days when they knew nothing about sanitation and never washed. There were also, said Dr. Alington, very few things ,which they could say. with certainty everybody ought to know. He continued : . ''Everyoiic should write intelligibly and should be able., to express himself in his own .'language in a way intelligible in conversation with everyone else. He must be able to subtract and divide and multiply in a reasonable way, or he would be a nuisance to himself and others. I think you must let people follow - their own . taste a good deal more ift our education. In my profession" we try to> teach all in the same way, as if they were going to be scholaj-s. whereas 70, 80, or ift) per cent, are not.: We give them the same number-of.'subjects, and I <lo not think it is fair.'";■ The things .people learned between 10 and 18, Tie said, were those they never forgot.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19320318.2.21

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume LXVIII, Issue 20499, 18 March 1932, Page 4

Word Count
234

ARE BOYS BETTER FOR A WASH? Press, Volume LXVIII, Issue 20499, 18 March 1932, Page 4

ARE BOYS BETTER FOR A WASH? Press, Volume LXVIII, Issue 20499, 18 March 1932, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert