Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

PORT CHARGES.

j * I LYTTBLTOX HARBOUR BOARD'S REDUCTIONS. A iVMre to make the graving dock charge* at th* Port of Lyttclton as retuonabtp as possibk. and to bring the charges into lm«« with those operating at Port Chairnvrs. led to the Harrxinr Board, at a special meeting vest«rdsiy. deciding to amend its bylaws to provide for a sliding s*~aie of dork charges in accordance with tonnage. "That the proposed by-laws be amended by deleting from the by-law relating to gravinc dock the words 'For all reswels up to 900 tons . £3.V and snbstitatintc For vessels up to 300 tons for four days or less, £lB : for »essK>!s *>l to 400 tons for fonr days or less, i' 22: /or ressels 401 to «399 tons for fo-ir days or less. £2O: for vessels 7t» to ■><:») tons for four dav§ or Jpss. j £3O: for res.***ls mi to 000 tons lor i four day* or ks.s, I C'Apta'in Monro was the mover, and I the seer*tan, Mr C 11. Clihborn. ndTisetl that the loss to the Board last 1 year, on the supers! t ton that the j, anw;n«twi charge had been in operation i then, wouM have h4-sen onlv £77. The I Bn«rd would s«w>n make that up. he thought, because the port wonfd be j visited hr more smaller vessel* that i now stent to the Otago port. [ TK> resolution was carried unanimously. [ >lr riibborn e\plain«l that there j had formerly been no proper basis ot I ctmiparisW hecanw the Otago neal* w»s j ha«e«f ou net tonnage, while Lyttelton | h»*ed its charge* noon arvm tonnage i The cr-mparisoti of charges a* at 1 f!<-tob«'r ;'l«t tatt was shown to be n« foilows for the fir*t four days in • lock - I.St'elton Of ago .t.-ale on St.-»t* on ; ricoos lennage Net tontjage ] T'ian.»x- of V»«*e:». * • 1 I .. IS <> 30 | lot *no . . .15 <* ™* • *o t r»nii . . r.z a rsa | r,nt~nn .. n* n 4: ret »m .. ?. m * n *n f an|.9nn ~ 7.S n *.o J <iO|.JO»O .. JO .14 i tool 1100 .. 40 0 ."* I ItOI-lSftO . . 4% O K." 1 tint-isno .. so o wi t3ftt-t4OO .. 50 f> TO J ttet-ITOo .. 30 n T4 I !T0!-?o«o ~ SO 0 T* "iini «sno .. s.» o «? .toon .. S.jo sfi I ".W)|.3.VO *SO O !»0 tint, won ~ an n f»S j 4001.3000 ~ «So ion ".onl-itlMvn .. 70 o 105 *<>ol TOoo . . T3 " 110

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19291107.2.144

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume LXV, Issue 19770, 7 November 1929, Page 16

Word Count
393

PORT CHARGES. Press, Volume LXV, Issue 19770, 7 November 1929, Page 16

PORT CHARGES. Press, Volume LXV, Issue 19770, 7 November 1929, Page 16

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert