NO BREACH OF PRIVILEGE.
HON. MR ATMORfS REMARKS.
[TBB nUtSS Ssedsl ■erttoaj
WELLINGTON*, Saptfciibtf S-5. "la the opinion of the OoMtottea the words complained of do not coafc* * tute a breach of privilege as Ibsy 9^t4 used in a jocular sense." This was th% \ finding the Committee on Privilege ta» | ported to the House of Reoreeantatiw* f to-day in regard to the recent lobby..j incident in which the Minister w Education (the Hon. Mr Atmore) fait J* to Mr A. M Samnel (R., Thames): *T f will tell them something about yo« "» | fejgypt." % Speaking to the report, the Lsadtr of the Opposition (Mr Coates) state* *- that the finding represented tbt oo*» J se&sns of opinion of the Coß»auttoS4gJ The resolution would not have bata-aJjj rired at had the members not satisfied that the remarks were HM<Hf|| in a jocular sense and that no dowlrtull tion could be taken from them. Jj The report was tabled. '-M
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19290926.2.71
Bibliographic details
Press, Volume LXV, Issue 19734, 26 September 1929, Page 8
Word Count
156NO BREACH OF PRIVILEGE. Press, Volume LXV, Issue 19734, 26 September 1929, Page 8
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Press. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Christchurch City Libraries.
Log in