OPAWA TRAM SERVICE

Press, Volume LXV, Issue 19644, 13 June 1929, Page 8

OPAWA TRAM SERVICE

I BURGESSES* ASSOCIATKW "It' PEESS BBQTBT. "The position practically ■■■■■alt' i this now, ta*t we are giwaf sat 1/H+ way Board two years' timatp *BONI not to renew the traeka," «■■•■■•• ber of the Opawa Bmigtrnm' **■■*» tion last evening, u reply to lit altf* meat that it wi aahaely *■* *• Tramway Board would Uka mp *J* in regard to the anfgottfd ■*» •■» rout* to Opawa for two jtantt ■* Following on a request ttmt *• Opawa Burgesses' Aatociata* <X * new tram route to Opawa •■'•J _*J Ferry road to Fitageraid aveawa, M Faisgrave street, aad joaiaf **g2 the present lice at the tanm «f *!■► grave street and Opawa ra *•*■ down, a number of Pydemkaai men forwarded a letter t* **• *jJJ[j* way Board asking if it wwM J*f£ a deputation protettiag agaiaat ■»Jjjlr gestion of the Opawa Bargwa*' **■* elation. __ . The Tramway Board "t"** there wonM be »o nmi tm tt* m£a tatioa, aa it tu ualikaly tfetftltßlPf would do anything ia the ■■*■» •» two years at least. _^^ A 'member of the «P*» Mated last evenirg taa» ia* iuttm ■■* the Sydenham business »«■ ■*■ ■•" discussed ia committee. ____,^a^ It had been pointed e*t, thinirß. that tb* tram hnes o» route were food for two w nse. In view of this, it ha* sidered unlikely t?°at say artwa be taken ia the matter for tw» ]•■» at least. ««^^*?* "We intend lo paah Daf „ r **TS* said a member of tar *^* , ( Sl*?lJJl> Association last evening " S. tion amount* prs'ttcally ** that we are giving it' two year*' timely waraiaf P"*f*S track* deteriorating, so that tmf ■■■ not be renewed."