Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

The Square.

The letter which we printed yesterday from Mr George Gould was the first public protest against the Mayor's attack on the Board of Health for refusing to sanction a loan for Square " improvements.'' Mr Archer had suggested, very improperly, that " private " or semi-private influences " had been "allowed to override the decision of " the elected representatives of the " people," and it was necessary to say very plainly what the real facts are. The Board's action was not in the least degree " inscrutable" to people of good taste, and since the Minister.seems to have given some kind of an undertaking to reconsider the application after New Year, the danger has not vet passed. Mr Archer no doubt believes that a body like the Board of Health should have only a formal discretion; that when the " elected " representatives of the people have spoken the " appointed " representatives should not ask any further questions. But even if the position were as simple as that, the Mayor's attitude would be difficult to understand. For Mr Archer is not an ill-informed man, nor an illinformed Mayor, and on questions like the beautifying of the City and the honouring of fallen soldiers he can be trusted to look above and beyond the heads of most of his followers. On the hoardings question he has been a

stout fighter (in occasionally tight comers) for civic decency and dig-nity, and he would not have found the Board's conduct inscrutable if he had realised that what is "behind this " refusal" is simply a bigger and more solemn mass of objections than he himself has to street advertising. The Square ought to be the civic centre only in the best sense. It was never intended to be either the traffic, or the trading, or the amusements centre, but a place in which citizens would get the strongest impression of the things that Christchurch really stands for. It would be quite horrible, if it ever came to pass, that a visitor should notice (first or before long) that Christchurch is a generous city sanitarily.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19280105.2.25

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume LXIV, Issue 19200, 5 January 1928, Page 6

Word Count
343

The Square. Press, Volume LXIV, Issue 19200, 5 January 1928, Page 6

The Square. Press, Volume LXIV, Issue 19200, 5 January 1928, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert