Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SUPREME COURT ACTION.

HEARING IN PRIVATE RESIDENCE.

One of the rare instances of a sitting of the Supreme Court having been held in a private residence, and the first occasion upon which it has ever sat in Ashburton occurred on Saturday, before Mr Justice Adams, when the initial proceedings in the action of Roberts v. the Bank of New Zealand and the remaining members of the family of the late B. G. Wright, an echo of the Morgan v. Wright case, was heard at the residence of the Hon. Mr Nosworthy. The proceedings, which lasted nearly all, day, consisted of the examination of Mrs Harriet Myra Wright, widow of E. G. Wright, and mother of the plaintiff, regarding the circumstances surrounding the exercise of the power of attorney given to her by Mrs C. C. Roberts while the latter was in England, and by which a deed of compromise was entered into by the beneficiaries, and regarding which Mrs Roberts questions whether that nower of attorney was properly exercised. This unusual procedure was adopted, a,s all the parties recognise that on account of Mrs H. M. W.right'B age and physical disabilities, it was norreasonable to ask her to attend at the Courthouse in Christchurcfe Mr J. H. Upharn, with him Mr E. W White, appeared for plaintiff (Mrs Roberts), Sir John Findlay, K.C., with him Mr A. F. Wright, for the Bank of New Zealand; Mr F. Wilding, K.C., for Mrs Morgan and family, Mr A. C Cotterill for the trustees of E. G. Wright, and Mr Geo. T. Weston, for Douglas George Wright. The case was adjourned to the Supreme Court, at Christch« rch.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19271107.2.125

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume LXIII, Issue 19151, 7 November 1927, Page 13

Word Count
275

SUPREME COURT ACTION. Press, Volume LXIII, Issue 19151, 7 November 1927, Page 13

SUPREME COURT ACTION. Press, Volume LXIII, Issue 19151, 7 November 1927, Page 13

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert