Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Political Economy.

The farmer who writes to us to-day from Waihao Downs praying that the Government will not increase the number of politicians, but rather reduce it, expresses a widely-held opinion. But he expresses an opinion universal amongst honest and intelligent students of politics when' he pleads that the Government should make some effort to prevent the dreadful waste of time involved in the debate on the Address. There is, unhappily, no means whereby the Prime Minister can forcibly cut short the string of speeches. He can, indeed, suggest to the Whips that they should use their influence with members, but there «:e some things which neither Whips nor Prime Minisljers can be 3ure of doing. One of them is the persuasion of a member who has prepared a long speech and who is aching to see it, first in Hansard, and afterwards in the hands of his constituents, that it will be noble of him to scrap the speech and save the country £SO or £IOO. For there are few members of Parliament who would not reply tßat their hour or half-hour of eloquence is worth much imore than that to the country, and the strange thing is that the reply would be sincere. Although, therefore, the power of the Government to curtail debate is, as it ought to be,'very small, yet the Prime Minister can, if he chooses, refrain from encouraging his friends to prolopg those general, and generally valueless debates which empty the galleries and fill Hansard. Parliament costs something near £IOO an hour, and ought therefore to be looked upon by' any Government desirous of saving money as a useful department for the exercise of thrift. I* the House would only reverse its usual practice, hurry over the debate on the Address, the debate on the Financial Statement, and any debates on motions of no-con-fldence, and spend some time on the Bills which are usually passed without discussion at the end of the session, the producers who pay for the talk would not so greatly* mind the cost of the Legislature.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19260622.2.40

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume LXII, Issue 18724, 22 June 1926, Page 8

Word Count
345

Political Economy. Press, Volume LXII, Issue 18724, 22 June 1926, Page 8

Political Economy. Press, Volume LXII, Issue 18724, 22 June 1926, Page 8

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert