ON EQUAL TERM.
SyVWjM AUCKLAND PROFESSOJ* M COMMISSION'S BBPOtRL i ■hi M, „, —€■ i J& (fhjm Ajsjcatjio* WJMaadpJ AUCKLAND, Febnwrj j| A strong attack on the r«tsafs ssl recent University Co;i2injs§|gs X g made by Professor A. C. P*t*r«ei an address at a meeting of shJsij of Convocation of Auckland pp2 College. At the spa time hi im the opportunity to state that ifyl+ cision to found m agricultural gggi near Alarton was a fatal mist*j»"a the point of view of «sei«tn«w. it could not be otherwise, fee &ss>■ cause, owing to the lack of support,, it was quite impossiWeTte' babiish an agricultural f«?lw| Auckland on anything Bio Mp| quata basis. This .vlartou would militate against the future success of iege of Agriculture. ? The moral sficet on agricultural i dents of mixing freely and «$ M terms with other student* „| faM vertisy was an advantage tftat - m not be overestimated. Wtai*«tf£j culture maintains a separate egss| the students almost of themselves inferior to the stofHtp tlie universities. "Thus the mm the lack of support on the part eß| community of AuoJiiajid," he saifc that our Agricultural College it & eel to inferiority in work ape} f^gm
Conuaisßlon'B ■' Professor Vater&pft said tfee_ ssgjj sinners, bad failed to J«j &ej? |§| on the two great weak pejau M!f lN'ew tpm iwd iUe teck ot sm*& Hf various institutions by the jWggtii local communities. Tiia were pleased to say that tsf «| substantially m W*?o»est wife W& port of the «jouthr African Oamffiffi but they tailed to say that tm i African report was atiilbeflm two years later the Opwaffiffl* M ed independence tp two Wss ssj| tips of South Africa. The oogpi ers had thfr light, but ojg q« $ it. Very strong evideao# agl them in regard to the | had fpllow&d the gr*nting el WM& ence to South Afriea aid imm but the Commission Btatedj much reliance could* aefe i» pjik«4| such a comparison. 1 "You would have thought," sai&l feasor Patersoa, "that two sp«» mM cstionaj this would have tak«n the portunity qf telling the peop|| m J Zealand where thetr- fault WJ ra« of their shortconHi?® M furring to th# financial yeloping a yejlflg eounto, I W that was criminal neglect of § m opportunity. They should ffl ed out as strongly ss they os&|J the great fefttiure of every country hut New SealiM'K growth of the city result of subpart hy tfegK^yL?%
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19260226.2.68
Bibliographic details
Press, Volume LXII, Issue 18626, 26 February 1926, Page 14
Word Count
397ON EQUAL TERM. Press, Volume LXII, Issue 18626, 26 February 1926, Page 14
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Press. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Christchurch City Libraries.