PRIVY COUNCIL.
—-•——4» DIVORCE CASE SETTLED. (32 CABLE—PRESS ASSOCrATIOJT—COMMOHT.) (ATJSTEALUH Aim h.z. cablb associatioh.J LONDON, February 23. The Privy Council judgment in the case, Attorney-General of Alberta versus Mrs Cook, decided questions which have exercised international lawyers for generations. The first is whether a wife, judicially separated ironiJher husband, may acquire another domicile. The second is whether a wife may obtain a divorce upon sufficiently legal grounds prevailing in the State of her new domicile, although the husband is not domiciled there. The Privy Council answered the questions in the negative.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19260225.2.81
Bibliographic details
Press, Volume LXII, Issue 18625, 25 February 1926, Page 9
Word Count
91PRIVY COUNCIL. Press, Volume LXII, Issue 18625, 25 February 1926, Page 9
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Press. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Christchurch City Libraries.
Log in