THE MOUAT CASE.
MTHKIDnoi O* "THE MM S." oa,~ Are tbo people of Christchurch bo hardened that they do not know r«x>r ,*«*& With Q° "anaiM of the accoiriwT U^ t<J Mrs M °uat, who. tta lfj» ™ e Law Agrees that thev not W < i? niamß: thenN-hy are they Z ery Christian has the wffl t v7\° "* thc law in n»°tioi , «TU not tad to do the right thing It does not matter what our private opuupns aro whether they are her &« + y h - ey are her remauus. As Uk^fr 5 "Y , Ch land, let u, fK„« i trust someone more able Ss'l™,!! 11 toke this matter up tho law of bunal is not broken by those who represent the ™'i 1 refuses to burv her remains, then we will susnect thrT Law is not positive they are her remains.— lours, etc.. ONE WHO LOVED HER.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19250914.2.77.1
Bibliographic details
Press, Volume LXI, Issue 18486, 14 September 1925, Page 9
Word Count
145THE MOUAT CASE. Press, Volume LXI, Issue 18486, 14 September 1925, Page 9
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Press. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Christchurch City Libraries.
Log in