NEW BRIGHTON SCHOOL.

Press, Volume LIX, Issue 17747, 26 April 1923, Page 10

NEW BRIGHTON SCHOOL.

TO THS BDITOB OT "iHI || Sir,—l should like to be iW, 8 correct an error in vout tw 11 Monday night's proceeiha householders' meeting *?H nexion with the above. ThennJiyll attribute to Mr J, G. tna motion moved by Jij ft'nvH though worded by Jar seconued by him, and re^lfcSSjß "That this meeting .."Ml the Board of Education indjtag&M the necessity of standarduiiijiSsffl books, and that the booksijSufH the property of the DepartnSfM the policy of the to economise owing to ency of the period, and ow S&S Committee have already airttaSgM dence of this on the parttfrt?|BM cation Department, could only have one eniWjSH cost to the Department if were adopted in' the Brighton School alone something in the vicinity of first year on the figures pnr&Sl the headmaster, based mated cost of hooks per (Wklfl num. This would have plied by the number of sclio<£jjjßK| to Now Brighton throughoii®|M minion, to say nothing ofWisSH schools. The question of siaiiijuHl the various Stand-aid the coilntry, so that a Second Standard; and so be allowed to continue' moved from New without' purchasing fresh rvital one, and no parent ifft&jjflH express themselves" in and it would have been '-mfl a valuable waste of timejojSM opportunity of stressing question by clouding;; gestion that the books should b f y the Department, and risk of the partment of the whole view must have -been.• chairman of the own initiative, suggested should amend the but the. suggestion 'I consequently moved deleting the second inal motion, which on' meeting was carried.—