PROHIBITION RHETORIC.
»0 IBM EDITOR OK "THE PRESS/
g- a in your columns of this date "Another Anglican," in explaining and excusing Dr. Amor's ''injudicious" reference to Judas in her recent aduress, finda fault -with an earlier correspondent for nis interpretation of a passage in that speech. I wonder what Dr Amor and "Another Anglican" would think about the "meanings" of those persons who, in the name ot "Efficiency," would rote for prohibition in hopes of getting more work out of their employees, though no abstainers themselves and determining to lay in a stock of their favourite beverage, wnicn they would 'deny to their less fortunate toilers.—l am, etc., ™„„„. DIVES. November 28th, 1022.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19221202.2.110.1
Bibliographic details
Press, Volume LVIII, Issue 17627, 2 December 1922, Page 18
Word Count
113PROHIBITION RHETORIC. Press, Volume LVIII, Issue 17627, 2 December 1922, Page 18
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Press. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Christchurch City Libraries.
Log in