FUND FOR THE BLIND.

Press, Volume LVIII, Issue 17461, 23 May 1922, Page 6

FUND FOR THE BLIND.

The grants; Ti»W%;i|S|4, the fmi m;)Mi^fgjmm^ fit of the mvllisn b))W'|i«>. land, end. m^mmm^m^ Sir Arthur .PJ^^Mj^jp' The practica^tohiwW'-V^m'H'tUM to the to the f in 6^^QbSmittdeV'. fcliii'ftjii the coromii^,jf|ft(ji^||Mg^;^ . "The report that'ltr*So»6Wi*' the Council grant Memorial committee, is tion on tlto:.mWtf>s^-ml ' A letter- war W*?MiW!mM troJer and was no epeoisl • enabling the CoiinffljlpWO (fls to the Sir Arthu^fe*W v #»# Fund. The PubH6'H*Veny«*irtW»* for "unauthorised" was the'*? •» able source, ■ "'I "liL^t . The city solicitor dMFpJS the Council could riot CWHWWrf memorial fund out of the WW W Or. Suliivan m6ved thrtWW 61 should approach the Gcyertw»«« ask that steps be taken to nWW* r Cr. j. R. Brunt seconded tow** Cr. J. A. Flesher suggeiWlW» • deputation should wait on.iMJP Minister'during his forthcoming t*° Christchurch. ■ " "u*»id This suggestion *&.*&??s£ n deputation was appointed » Mr Massey.

'' ,'i A deputation, comprising 3WV Bean, Mrs Tkncker, and »JHt land, waited on the New BjWjg ough Council lost evening) a«m with.-the Sir Arthur ft*J rial Fund for the Civilian BW Zealand. Mrs »•» <Wgjjt object of the appeal, a f° *LIT£ sa/d that if the. Council. JJiS of £4O, which would kJftiSLL the city grunt, there « u ftJJ? be no advert* comment f"*™!! 1,a tne'Mayor (Mr J. OM^fjJ the deputation of the owf»j* pathy with the movement. • w p Ait.rr the deputation had decided to rcte the sum jeet to authoriHUtion by?"™--itient. _ ',., i'-

' : —- t I j Messrs S, A; OwM «£fo Donaldson, representing t» *sfl inittw.. of the Sir Arthur Peao»L, waited on thn Bicoftrton Brt«B,fl oil Inst niaht with a *M«?Jf!i7l bodv should make » doBd" I'i-ihl. Jt was stated "'"JS. fewer than fiofl blind in *»?*! m After the denization had W*»lT ft if was deeide'd, on Stcero, that the matter **9fi* ferred to tl.e Finance be dealt with when consider 1 "* m mates. • _ '