RE-TRIAL OF HAYNE.

Press, Volume LVIII, Issue 17391, 28 February 1922, Page 5

RE-TRIAL OF HAYNE.

;• IJ|f EVIDENCE PRODUCED. AGAIN DISAGREE. ♦rial of James Reynold Hayne, r Sanedin, on charges arising '• death of Ada Atkins, } ' tioSapreme Court yesterV V There were two charges against 1W- . iDe m That at Timaru on No- ;« «*f d: «* fce unlawfully killed one ■ thereby committing ' and (2) iKDunedbon October 7th he I '*? Ml. used an instrument or other I Ada Atkins, with It "*"'? £ nrocure a miscarriage. I #/ S Bench, and Mr L. Har\p*££***«°* of tise T Donnelly, Crown Prwe- ? r inducted the case for the *" w{or ' C Hanlon, of DuniiSStftofec S. Thomas, ap- • for the prisoner. - «<>« were ordered to stand - 1 •& „v,the Crown Prosecutor, and '''iSSil bt the defence challenged five. '' *ft ope nm g address ' r th \ Crown t *£gg mdieated that fresh eviKonld be produced, corroborates, deceased woman's statement sSt was at Hayne's establishment. . n?Mter-card sent to Hilton was !&« by the deceased, but the adSain the handwriting of another SSn It was submitted that the per- ' Silk) addressed the card was a Miss . msa'vbo was employed at Hayne's *'S*»ttße time. Counsel stated to |S oil that corroboration of tlie dead ,Zsfflt evidence, would be required, " ■'" corroboraI addressed : .Hilton, the detec--1 that the f Hayne's in her desn by 'Dr. rintendent )r. George brother of ' The let!nt to him iing inside it the ad•ltmg. the Banij d had extures. ■ifcness the , and two son." e Crown inion that le person, id in both was spelt the signa-* wn. ity in the form the ■wrote the erson who ,< said that mce. In n" on the the some '» on the 11-essmaker (nsru, was 3 said that i Dunedin Ids. She ree weeks, fitness rej Hayne's re was no itted that t3 writing, is on that d'she did ever havh a Crown [r Hanlon ag of wit fc accused, it's being ecobfniend mdwriting at it may dly likely sen on the idin, paTe nby him r the deinry, 'TOtn'esf,\ng the mbmitttfd, ■y the wo. > new eviitm;? went that the ms at the in an ad- ; over an He subot convict i they had contended corrohorai'b stateto answer he Crown, Crown to at forward if the prisromwing reference lis-spelling could only it so misn., and on igree on a y that yon tot I sup:h to make here is no lied for a t. The retrial -was re, self in