Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

COST OF LIVING.

STRANGE VARIATIONS l

How cost of food varies in the four centre.-, is graphically shown in a table prepared by tho Government Statistician. Since July, 1911 (before tho war) ag on November loth last Auckland groceries are 24,53 per cent, dearer; in Wellington 27.5 V) per wnt.; Christchurch 120.65, and Duncdin 23.87 per; cent. It is amazing (says the Welling, ton "Post 7 '), except to those in tho trade, -vvhy groceries should bo seven, per cent, dearer in Wellington than in Christehurch. and why Dunedin should obtain its groceries 1 per cent, cheaper than Auckland.

Dairy produce again has risen sinco the war 28.08 per cent, in Auckland, and that is fo.lß per cent. higher than in Wellington, where the rise is but 12.90 per cpnt. on pre-war rates, according to these figures. 3feat, argain, since the war is shown ag 23.91 per cent, dearer in Auckland, while in Christeburch it is 28.00 per cent. How this difference of values is arrived at is a mystery to those unfamiliar with the meat trade. The variations in the percentage increase** in smaller towns are quite astonishing. For instance, New Plymouth shows a war-period rise of 12.05 per cent, in the price of groceries, while Hamilton's increase is 31.58. Dairy produce foodstuffs 'hav« rieen by 8.11 per cent, in Taihape aad 9.36 per cent, in Gore, while in Wanganui and Palmerston North they have advanced 24,3G and 26,14 per cent, respectively. Nelson's meat cost 5.37 per cent, more than it did before the war, but the butcher's bills of the residents of Waihi and Gisborne have advanced 42.22 per cent and 54.88 per confc. respectively. Truly mysterious figures, those. Is tho cost of distribution too heavy? Is competition too keen, or is\ there not enotigh competition? The consumer, as such, is naturally left in a quandary on perusing these figures. The increases in July, 1915, July, 191<>, and November, 1016, over the prices ruling on July 31st, 1914, in the' four centres, show as under:—

Incrcaso Increase Increase Julv, Jul}', Xor. f 1315. 1916. 1916.' per cent, per cent, percent. Auckland .. 9.72 19.54 21.28 Wellington .. 14.77 2a,11 20*87 Chrisichnrch .. 9.53 3(5.37 24*21 Ihinedin ... 13.05 J 8. .in .. Dominion average 12.15 19,25 22!t.L •

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19170108.2.80

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume LIII, Issue 15793, 8 January 1917, Page 8

Word Count
373

COST OF LIVING. Press, Volume LIII, Issue 15793, 8 January 1917, Page 8

COST OF LIVING. Press, Volume LIII, Issue 15793, 8 January 1917, Page 8

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert