IN DIVORCE
CURTIS v. CURTIS. Mary Curtis (Mr Alpers) v. Frank Curtis (Mr Raymond. X.C.. with him Mr Eric Harper), application for alimony. Mr Alpers said that the petition for alimony was a year and _ome months out of time, but ho contended that the woids of th© section did not bear out tho rule. The petition was not granted. WALTEII v. WALTER. Mary Waiter (Mr Eric Harper) petitioned for the dissolution of her marriage with Charles. Henry Leo Walter (Mr Alpers). The easo had been pr»-vioi-sly before tho Court-. Grace Gertrude Pope stated-that "he had taken proceedings against respondent for the maintenance of lv's illegitimate child, and Mr Bishop, S.M., made an order on October 28th. 1913. i Walter opposed that application, but had not appealed against that order. Evidence was also given by Mary j Pone. ' -| His Honour granted "the petition, the I decree to be made absolute in three months, the petitioner to havo custod}of the children. Costs against tho respondent on the highest scale—£4s— were allowed. The Court adjourned till 10.30 a.m. on Monday.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19150306.2.91.3
Bibliographic details
Press, Volume LI, Issue 15220, 6 March 1915, Page 13
Word Count
178IN DIVORCE Press, Volume LI, Issue 15220, 6 March 1915, Page 13
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Press. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Christchurch City Libraries.
Log in