COURT OF APPEAL.
(FP.ESS ASSOCIATION" TELEGRAM.) WELLINGTON. March 26. Tho Appeal Court sat this morning to hear argument in the case, Pitcaithley and Co. v. McLean and Son, en appeal from the decision of Sir Ilobert Stout upon a special case arising out of a claim by appellants for £20,000 damages for a breach of sub-contract under which the appellants undertook to ipply gravel and sand to respondents for the Wellington Dock contract.' Sir Kobert Stout held that under the sub-contract the respondents were only bound to order what material they required for their purposes. Appeilants held that this was not the correct interpretation, but that the respondents had to take all the gravel-and san'l provided for in the specifications. Mr Bell, K.C., Sir John K.C., and Mr D. Smith appeared for the appellants, and Messrs Morrison and Blair for the respondents. The argument is expected to occupy the greater part of to-morrow.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19120327.2.7
Bibliographic details
Press, Volume LXVIII, Issue 14314, 27 March 1912, Page 2
Word Count
153COURT OF APPEAL. Press, Volume LXVIII, Issue 14314, 27 March 1912, Page 2
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Press. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Christchurch City Libraries.