Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

FINAL PROCEEDINGS IN COURT.

MR PLOWDEN'S REMARKS.

DEFENDANTS CHARACTER VINDICATED.

(Received January 7th, 10.59 p.m.) ( LONDON, January 7. Mr Plowden asked Mr Atherley Jones what impression Dr. Peppor'e very renuirknblo evidence had produced on his mind. Mr Jones 6aid it was impossible to pr<sss the case further. Ho complained of tho undeserved obloquy cast upon tho prosecution, considering that, with the, exception of one witness, the largo body of the evidence was unshaken by etrenuoijK and prolonged ernes-examina-tion. Aftor the exhumation it was impossible, to deny that it had been clearly demonstrated that Druco dirxj in London and was buried at Highgate, and that the body exhumod waa the same body as that buried. There was also strong evidence to show that the body was that of Druco. While Herbert Druco ivas right in refusing to open tho grave under menace of p_ro»eciition, ho had shown wise judgment in yielding to the moral pressure of public opinion. Mr Plowtlcn said that after the silont but important voice from tho grave, it would Ik* impossible to continue the prosecution without serious injury to justice, but apart from this now dramatic feature, Mr Jonioe nnist havo felt the foundations of his case slipping away after tho collapse of his inotst important witness , and his long, frtiitlnes cro.'ss-e.xaminatiou of Nurse Bailey. At last the bubble which had floated so long and mischievously out of reach had been effectively wrecked. No ono could now doubt that Drueedied amid his family, ami was buried in Highgato. His existence stood out as clear, distinct, and undeniable as that of any human l>eing who ever lived. How the myth confusing him with Portland arose, it w«s idle to speculate. Trie case was v, fresh instnnoo of hew tihe love of the marvellous was deeply ingrained in human nature, and was a striking proof of tho truly unfathomable depths of human credulity. The Court thanked Mr Herbert Drnco for consenting, in the interests of justice, to the distasteful stop of opening the grave. Ho left tho Court with his character for truthfulness absolutely and conclusively vindicated.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19080108.2.32.14.2

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume LXIV, Issue 13007, 8 January 1908, Page 7

Word Count
348

FINAL PROCEEDINGS IN COURT. Press, Volume LXIV, Issue 13007, 8 January 1908, Page 7

FINAL PROCEEDINGS IN COURT. Press, Volume LXIV, Issue 13007, 8 January 1908, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert