Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

CLAIM AGAINST A DENTAL COMPANY.

■ a- - fSPZCIAZ. TO "THB PRESS.") DUNEDIN, November 22. Th© hearing of the cas© Harrison v. tho London Dental Company, claim of £2000 for domages sustained through alilegeel negligent and unskilful extraction of teeth, was continued in the Supremo Court this morning. Dr. Lindo Ferguson stated h© was of opinion that thero wis come foreign body lodged in the mini's lung. If « person were too deeply immersed in th© nnassthetie his tongue would fall txiek into his throat, but tj'.iere should b© no difficulty in getting th© tongue hockagain. Ther© were no signs of tuberculosis about the patient. Dr. Roberts said he examined pliintiff'b sputum and found absolutely no traces ©f tuberculosis. Dr. H. P. Picker ill exhl it was per-muss-iblp for a dentist to himself administer «n anesthetic provided there was a second person present. There was lhvoys a of a piece of tooth dJXM.ping from tfie forceps, but with proper car© this should never happen. In the cne© of a prolonged sitting it was absolutely necessity that a skilled person should be in attendance to administer tho anaesthetic. Inhered that the adoption of Paterson's nasal inhaler, used by the London Dental Company, was a temptation to a de.it.Ft to tak© unneeessirv risks. Th© patient was thereby liable" to become too deeply immerseel in the anaesthetic, and if, while h© was in this condition, a tooth escaped down his throat ther© was a. greater possibility of its becoming lodged in his windpipe. Th© ©scape of 3. tooth into « patient's lun-g was a danger to his life. It was desirable that a dentist should not be hurried while operating, and that bis attention should be centred wholly en his work of extracting teeth. Dr. William Newlarid* Mid h© was in ehirge of the X rays department at th© hospital. He made a series of photographs of plaintiff, and there was something shown in the negatives that might indicate the presence of a foreign substance on the lung.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19071123.2.68

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume LXIII, Issue 12969, 23 November 1907, Page 10

Word Count
331

CLAIM AGAINST A DENTAL COMPANY. Press, Volume LXIII, Issue 12969, 23 November 1907, Page 10

CLAIM AGAINST A DENTAL COMPANY. Press, Volume LXIII, Issue 12969, 23 November 1907, Page 10

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert