Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SUPREME COURT.

(PBRSa ASSOCIATION TKLEQIIAM.) .- "* WELLINGTON. Soptomiwr !). « the Supreme Court to-day tlio t vhi«f Juetico gnvc judgment in the f. :,lfw S c "' n B ton t'ity Council v. Lnng?J™» *n appeal tho decision VMthe megistrato on n claim for rates. $«2? Council »«* tni l«l to provo that demnnd had been posted. His otdere<l that the magistmte's f\f^i*i° n k* revers<, d, and that n non- &*?* be enteral up. Tho Chief Justice r j fc2L*?*?r in tho case Com;.t.«wiol Union Assurnnco Company v. . Gamm ' l,l an< l Co., Mwmillers, a '"2L« t< l I rocover premiuina which had mu 1 * V promissory notes to Geo. 'tr*»L*.. «* company's manager for ■fiSTiSiSp*/- . At , hie "quest the bills m be«ft drawn in forour of White, who ;/«* *<* *ceo.«ttt for the moner when , «» T *n for defendants with costs. Ir ' -

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19070910.2.58

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume LXIII, Issue 12905, 10 September 1907, Page 9

Word Count
135

SUPREME COURT. Press, Volume LXIII, Issue 12905, 10 September 1907, Page 9

SUPREME COURT. Press, Volume LXIII, Issue 12905, 10 September 1907, Page 9

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert