Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE EDUCATION BILL.

THE DISCUSSION ON CLAUSE IV. United Prose Association—By Electrics Telegraph—Copyright. LONDON, June 26. A debate ie proceeding in the Commons on Mr Evelyn Cecil's amendment to make Clause IV. of the Education Bill mandatory. Mr Birrell said the clause was an excrescence on the Bill. His amendment was an exception grafted cm an exception. He predicted that the local authorities would prevo reasonable in meet cases. Mr Herbert Paul, Dr. 0 McNamara, and Mr Hilaire Beiloc, Liberals, and tho Nationalists, preferred Mr E. Cecil's amendment. Mr Chamberlain said the Bill was drawn up on the wrong lines and was not amendable. The logical sequence of Mr Cecil's amendment would be the resumption of the country, and urban schools. W hat. would passive resisteis then cay?

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19060628.2.30.14

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume LXII, Issue 12531, 28 June 1906, Page 7

Word Count
128

THE EDUCATION BILL. Press, Volume LXII, Issue 12531, 28 June 1906, Page 7

THE EDUCATION BILL. Press, Volume LXII, Issue 12531, 28 June 1906, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert