Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

FORGING AND UTTERING.

JUDGE'S COMMENT OX A DEFENCE, (mass AssocMtton t_uoea_.) ' AUCKLAND, May 23. At the Supremo Court, Robert- Smith, aged 28, pleaded not guilty to forging a cheque for £12 7s, in the name, of William John Gribbin, a Waikato farmer, and passing it off on Ernest James Ralph Smith, in the settlement of a bill at the National Hotel at Cambridge, and getting £5 12s 6d change. Ho was defended by Mr J. R, Lundon. A Dunedin youth, named Lauri Smith,. alias Lyons, who was represented by Mr J. 0. Martin, pleaded guilty to assisting in passing off tho cheque, and gave -ling's evidence. Opening the case against Robert Smith, the Crown Prosecutor said the accused many years ago worked in Wellington for the father of . the younger accused, Lauri Lyons, and , he persuaded the latter, at tho age of 15 or 16 years, to leave his parents ; and travel with him. They seemed to : have led n vagabond life in various - roles throughout the colony, and in' s time gravitated to the farm of William John Gribbin, between Cambridge and .. Hamilton, who employed them, believing them to be brothers. The cheque for £12 7«j (produced) was nevor given by him to either of the men, and his name on it.was a forgery. After several witnesses had given evidence. Lauri Smith was examined, and was cross-examined with considerable vigour by Mr J. R. Lundon. His Honour, addressing the jury, said: —" If yon can believe the defence put forward by the prisoner, then God help the country." Tito jury found the accused guilty. His Honour said, without excusing the younger hoy, he was convinced that the prisoner had a big hand in leading the young rascal astray. He was liable to imprisonment for life, but, of course, that long sentence would not bo imposed, although it must bo sufficient to teach him that this sort, of thing would not do. A sentence of three years was passed. In regard to tlie hoy Lauri, his Honour said that ho was in a gem:© a first offender, and he would, therefore, ask the probation. officer to report on him noxt 3londay.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19050525.2.37.37

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume LXII, Issue 12203, 25 May 1905, Page 8

Word Count
360

FORGING AND UTTERING. Press, Volume LXII, Issue 12203, 25 May 1905, Page 8

FORGING AND UTTERING. Press, Volume LXII, Issue 12203, 25 May 1905, Page 8

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert