Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE VOIDED LICENSING POLLS.

A PROHIBITIONIST OPINION. (srECIAt TO "tSCS PRESS.") DUNEDIN, April 18. Mr John Macgregor, on whose opinion the Bruce Licensing Committee intends to act, and to grant no license, writes that it is perfectly obvious that the Premier is determined that on the liquor question the will of the people shall not prevail. Mr Macgregor point* out that on one point the Solicitor-General's opinion agrees with his, that no provision exists for taking a second poll. "Does the Premier propose," asks tie writer, "to remedy this defect in his own legislation? No. As soon as analogous defects are discovered in the Labour Act the trade union leaders have only to ask and any remedy is forthcoming. What is the explanation of the difference? Simply 'that the Premier is giving effect, not to the will of the people, but to the will of the liquor trade." Continuing, Mr Macgregor says:—"The Solicitor-General has advised that in spite of the fact that no vote has been taken, licenses can bo granted. The Premier knows that it would follow that licensees wrould be entitled to renewals except in certain specified cases. As to the correctness of the opinion of the Solicitor-General, that is a question that is certain to come before the Court of Appeal, and perhaps the Privy Council. 1 venture, however, to say that "sect ion 8 (4) of the Act of 1895 Ims no bearing on the question at all. There is no result, to declare, either in the affirmative or negative. This reasoning is analogous to that by which the Solicitor-General (rightly, I think) arrives at the conclusion that section -52 of the Licensing Act, 1881 (relating to 'mischance or misadventure'), has no application dn the case of the poll beintj void. "I am not afraid to commit myself to tho opinion that the point ia not even arguable." (PEiSS ASSOCIATION TELEGRAM.) WELLINGTON, April 18. The Wellington No License League has passed resolutions protesting against the action of the Wanganui Licensing Committee in issuing packet licenses in the prohibited native area, and deprecating the action of the Premier in gratuitously prejudging the question of granting licenses in Newtown wheii the matter in all probability will come before a Court of Law. The "League also passed a resolution expressing the opinion that the Newtown Licensing Committee should refuse to issue licenses unless ordered by the Supreme Court, and promising the Committee every assistance.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19030422.2.12

Bibliographic details

Press, Issue 11564, 22 April 1903, Page 4

Word Count
405

THE VOIDED LICENSING POLLS. Press, Issue 11564, 22 April 1903, Page 4

THE VOIDED LICENSING POLLS. Press, Issue 11564, 22 April 1903, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert