Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SUPREME COURT.

THE "JESSIE PAXM CASE." When the Court resumed yesterday his Honour summed up in the case of Elizabeth Yarr against Robert J. Lockhead for a claim of £400 damages for the loss of the trotting mare "Jessie Palm," -which, it was alleged, was killed owing to the negligence of the defendant. His Honour said that the value of th« mare when it was sent, to the defendant to be grazed, did not affect his- liability, even although he was only receiving 2s per week for crazing the animal. Doubt--1 less if the defendant had been aware of the value of the mare he would not have taken her at all. H the jury found there was no negligence, then they must find for the defendant; if they found there wa* negligence, then they must assess the mars at a fair value. After a lengthy retirement the jury returned a verdict for the defendant. His Honour gave judgment accordingly. THE CANTERBURY AUCTIONEERING COMPANY. Mr Stringer appeared for the official liquidator of the Canterbury Auctioneering Company upon a summons to settle the list of contributories of the Company, and to adjudicate upon claims. A number of shareholders appeared to objectMr Peter Bryson, fruiterer, Lincoln road, who was debited with two shares, said that he objected to certain false representations which lie said were made to him by the directors of the company. He had taken no legal steps to have his name taken off the register. His Honour pointed out that the question was one between the shareholders of the company and the creditors, i and not between the shareholders and the directors. The application was refused. Mr H. E. Boardman said he did not read the application for a share, although, he knew by the signing of it he was presumed Jo be a shareholder, and that somebody was going to pay the application fee. His Honour directed 'that Mr Boardman's name should remain on the list, unless, in the course of a week, he showed cause by summons why his name should be removed. Mr R. Sliarpe, the secretary of the oompanv, applied to haxe his name struck off as W holder of 160 Bliares, on the ground that by the agreement with the directors he was to be relieved of liability. The application was not granted. Unsuccessful applications were also made by Mr M- Donohue, Mr F. C. Hack, Mrs S. Hawksley, Mr K. T. Leathern, Mr C. E. Cantell, Mr E. Winterbom, Mrs Emily Davidson, and Mr W. ■ The names of Mrs Treihem (Mr Hunt), | Mr W. *'. Osborne, MrT. Mallett, Mr H. j A. U. Ferguson, Mr R. Oolthart, and Mr j James Buike were struck off from the Kst j of contributories.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19030218.2.10

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume LX, Issue 11511, 18 February 1903, Page 4

Word Count
457

SUPREME COURT. Press, Volume LX, Issue 11511, 18 February 1903, Page 4

SUPREME COURT. Press, Volume LX, Issue 11511, 18 February 1903, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert