BRITISH FISCAL POLICY
United Press Association—By Elticttio Telegraph—Copyright. ' . (Received June 21st, 12.52 a.m.) LONDON, June 20. Sir M. Hicks-Beach's statement in.reply to Mr Morley is favourably commented on on, the Continent, especially in Berlin.,
Mr Morley accused Sir M- Hicks Beach of opening a wide door to protection, and also of vaguely, hinting at an alteration of the financial relations between the Motherland, and the .colonies. The, effect of the substitution of colonial for foreign produce would be, he ' said, to raise the price of raw material!, increase the' cost of manufacture, handicap Great Britain abroad, and play ducks and drakes with her great trade.for the sake of a relatively small trade. It would be disastrous to interfere with the ramparts of British fiscal policy, which was the basis of Great Britain's opulence and credit. Sir Michael Hicks Beach, disclaimed the idea of using the tax on imported corn to alter the fiscal policy. The tax was necessary to meet financial requirements, it was. not the Government's policy to try to encourage colonial trade by initiating a tariff war with England's best customers. To talk of preferential duties woe trailing a red herring over the scent.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19020621.2.44.22
Bibliographic details
Press, Volume LIX, Issue 11305, 21 June 1902, Page 7
Word Count
196BRITISH FISCAL POLICY Press, Volume LIX, Issue 11305, 21 June 1902, Page 7
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Christchurch City Libraries.