Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

BLACK.

WHITE. (0 Kerr v. Bardeleben has not sufficiently considered Blast's cjuiel 16 P Xt, 3." v.-liich apparently mean: to prevent 17. P _ 5, but really intended to brinjr i«ck the Q Q 3. a powerful move, which breais up White's jjtune altogether. White's injudicious advance of the X Xt P facilitates matters for Black, as the sequel sho.vs. fs) He hr-s nothing better. With one stroke he ruined his frame entirely. (h) Under the impression o* resaining the piece with P Xt 5 ; but Biack simply replies (J Q 2, and so keeps the piece. The rest plays itself.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP18960104.2.17

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume LIII, Issue 9305, 4 January 1896, Page 3

Word Count
100

BLACK. Press, Volume LIII, Issue 9305, 4 January 1896, Page 3

BLACK. Press, Volume LIII, Issue 9305, 4 January 1896, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert