CHRISTCHURCH.
TnuitSDAr, Mabch 8. (Before R. Beetham, Esq., S.M.) CiVTti Cases.—Lake v Dalgety, claim £9 9s, for renb of a house; Mr Fisher for the plaintiff, Mr Stringer for tho defendant. The dispute was to. the term of tenancy, the amount claimed being the balance of a month's rent, alleged to have been agreed for. Judgment was for defendant with costs. In Berry and Co. v Laverty, claim £61656 d, judgment went for plaintiffs by default, with costs. Friday, Makch 9. (Before H. W. Bishop, Esq., S.M., and R. Westeura, Esq.j J.P.) Druntkenness—For this offence Mary Ann Brightmore was fined ss, and Mc.,, Mitchell 10s, each with the usual alternatives in case of default. Maintsiunce—Alfred Brown was ordered to pay 15s for the maintenance of his three children now in Burnham Industrial School. I
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP18940310.2.13.1
Bibliographic details
Press, Volume LI, Issue 8789, 10 March 1894, Page 4
Word Count
134CHRISTCHURCH. Press, Volume LI, Issue 8789, 10 March 1894, Page 4
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Christchurch City Libraries.
Log in