Page 2 Advertisements Column 5

Press, Volume XLVIII, Issue 8030, 26 November 1891, Page 2

BUCKEYE ALWAYS AHEAD, WANTED IFo KNOW, ON the Ota of April last, in the " Otago Witness," and Intermittently since in the "Weekly Press* , and "Canterbury Times, we have CHALLENGED our Competitors TO COMPARE their LAST SEASON'S SALES with ours. We challenged as follow (printing as a first Instalment the names and addresses of 170 of oar pur chasers last year):— McCormick to bhow 1 sale for every 1 Buckeye Wood's to show 1 sale for every 2 Buckeye Deering to show 1 sale for every 2 Buckeye Brantford to show 1 sale for every 2 Buckeye Massey to show 2 sales for every 3 Buckeye fiornsby to show 1 sale for every 3 Buckeye Howard to show I sale for every 10 Buckeye Zealandia "to show 1 sale for every 10 Buckeye Triumph to show 1 sale for every 10 Buckeye In other words, we claim to have sold at least as many machines as the McCormick last season, three Buckeyes to every fcwoMasseys, two Buckeyes for every one Woods, Deerings or Brautforda, three Buckeyes for every Horns by, and ten Buckeyes for every one Howard, Triumph and iiesJandia. Tlie challenge has remained uuanswered for over six mouths, and what we want to know is, are we right or wrong in our statemens. Agent JNO, ANDERSON, CHRISTCHURCH.