CHRISTCHURCH.
Thursday, Mat 21»
(Before R. Beetham, R.M., and H. J. Hall, J.P., Esqs.
Crvn, Cases.—Hammil v Kynd, claim £5. Mr Bruges for plaintiff. The p]_untiix alleged that the defendant, after having appointed him to value the stock and furniture of the Coalgate Hotel, withdrew the commission at the last moment. Plain tUc claimed to recover the sum agreed upoa to bo paid for the said valuation. After the evidence of the principals had baataken the case was adjournedtill Juno 11th for the production of a witness. Judgments went for plaintiffs by default, with costs, in Duffy v Schnessler, £14 2s; Mason, Struthers and Co. v Hayden, £1 12b lOd ; Brown v Staplcton. _J5 9s; Shaw V Hornsby, 14s; and Hastio v Broome, M 4s 7d. Fergus v Morris was adjourned till May 28th.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP18910522.2.14.1
Bibliographic details
Press, Volume XLVIII, Issue 7870, 22 May 1891, Page 3
Word Count
134CHRISTCHURCH. Press, Volume XLVIII, Issue 7870, 22 May 1891, Page 3
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Christchurch City Libraries.
Log in