CHRISTCHURCH.

Press, Volume XLVIL, Issue 7716, 22 November 1890, Page 2

CHRISTCHURCH.

Fbibay, Hotbmbeh 21 * (Before R. Weetenra, p. Caonhmw DrUBKEHMBSS.—Muv Ann thia offence, wa»S £{ «&&** &Hy-ei«ht h<mr&» imjttrfioSeS. ,l, 4e &S c Factors AOX.-mitcomteJi,,, • Smith, Anthony and Sellwe tt° d %»k Wlllla. and the LytttUto were charged ou separate itf* 0 * with having, at 52SSJS hSjHS several boya at wofk in establiahmente alter the hoars bJSS contrary to the provieiona of thW ment ol Females and others Mr Strln K er appeared for the diS'^. teet cases thej should L v the *» theßeeldent Magistrate. laenL** ,1 *t ~dw and Mr Stringer coiiwe the casea were »&*'& *• December 3rd. aa J°'"*e4 t|| BIOTOLES ON FOOTPATH.—R. » r* •<»» was charged with havJofrfe*' » bicycle on * footpath in li» street, Sydenham, oa Mr Perceval appeared j M % daoC Mr Throp, <&«* Inepeefcop, stated thatatOis^ 0 ® d»teb,amed the defendant on ran Into him. Witness tookhofiW 8 * anoVbothroUed over on fchegroj a l%» fendant woold not olve hf» *221' h wltnew kept hold ofhlm ilm &>» eatlsfled himselt who ltwit i>i?M afterwards witness went to "fiSr-JM* School, andJad tton with defendant, who Iβ a T> Defendant alterwardacaUedatth*^® I *' Council office, and left anotf Bffe , * He did not then deny that he wSffiS* but since had done Iα h doabt of defendanb'e ldentlt?^lM n9 him well. The defendant swore tl^ m ten on the niffht i a S^ 6 he was at home, or on his way S?W produced a witnew who Droved tS#J s ei«ht till ten o'clock detoSant wwsfS l Sydenham, E. Oholmondeley iff tp ,4 Huneley were each fined U wlttiXtr* Does.-Ja9, S«. Wra. Jarman and G. Garry, for jgjft their.poaaesaion *£ jeach fined 10s wUhcoeta.