THE CASE STANFORD V. LIQUIDATORS "DAILY TIMES" COMPAN Y.
[Press Special Wire.] DxnssDVsr, April 23. In the Supreme Court to-day, Juetioei Johnston and Williams gave judgment in the case Stanford v. the liquidators of the old " Daily Times" Company. The judgment was a very long, one, and at one point contained this statement:—"But for the elaborate argument en the subject, we should not have thought it arguable that a secret agreement by an intending purchaser with one of several shareholders or 00-ownere to paj him a sum of money to do his best to carry out a sale at a certain price, was* founded on anything but an illegal consideration. If such an agreement is founded on an illegal oon■ideration then, as the money was paid in order to obtain the property in question, and not for the purchase of anything the individual shareholder could sell, it must be treated as part of the purchase money and accounted for by the person who receivos it." The judgment concluded as follow*-.— " The case v this. Two of the largest shareholders in a company, one of' them being a director, conclude together to prevent a sale of the company's assets unless a sum of money is paid by the purchaser to each of them, in addition to what he pays to the company. They make a secret bargain with the purchaser to carry out their design, and each of them receives a large sum of in pursuance of it. Can it be doubted tbat they are altogether in pari delicti, and that each must be considered as a trustee for the company in respect of the money he has received. As we are of opinion for the foregoing reasons that the defendants are entitled , to succeed, it becomes unnecessary to enquire into the oiroum»tano*s upder which the monoy was handed over by plaintiff to the liquidator*. The liquidators therefore retain possession of the extra amount of £25 per share paid to Stanford, and which he had placed in their hands pending the result of the trial."
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP18790424.2.11
Bibliographic details
Press, Volume XXXI, Issue 4285, 24 April 1879, Page 2
Word Count
344THE CASE STANFORD V. LIQUIDATORS "DAILY TIMES" COMPANY. Press, Volume XXXI, Issue 4285, 24 April 1879, Page 2
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Christchurch City Libraries.