Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

CHRISTCHURCH.

Wednesday. July 30. (Before C. C. Bowen. Esq., R. M., and C. P. Cox, Esq., J.P.) VAGRANCY. —Dominick Houchard, who had been remanded on this charge, was again brought up. On promising to abstain from intoxicating liquors for the future, he was reprimanded and discharged. Louisa Mary Cnmming arfd Hugh Fraser were each charged with vagrancy, and sentenced to six months imprisonment. Dbuxkesxess—Joseph Robinson, charged by Sergeant Wilson, was fined 20s, or in default 48 hours imprisonment. Dbunk axd Disokderly—George Hunt, arrested by acting-sergeant Kennedy was fined ss. «,/-, -n Violent Assault — Thomas O Council aud William Chapman were charged with having violently assaulted PhUippa Huddy

at her residence in Colombo street. Mr Joynt appeared on behalf of the defendants. The prosecutrix, who bore upon her countenance the marks of violence, stated that the defendants came to her house las* bunday mominc and asked for a vessel to drink out of, either a glass or a broken cup. She said she had neither, and as they would not go away Bhe went to ask r. neighbor to come over that they might see she was not unprotected. As she was returning the rtefeiicniit Chapman struck her violently in the >v.w with his fist, causing a black eye. A wiin-s----named Bichards, who was in Mrs Huddv's house when the men came, deposed to that fact, but did not sec the assault committed. Mrs'Dixon, a neighbor, stated en behait of the pro*ecutrix,thatshecamc to berhouscaud asked her husband to go over ; be declined to do so. The witness" stated she saw some men at Mrs Huddy's house, but could not identify the defendants as being the same. James Moore deposed that on the Sunday morning in question he passed four men on the road, the defendants were two of them. They had a square bottle, which he supposed to contain drink as they were partly intoxicated. He subsequently saw tbe prosecutrix in Mrs Dixon's house, and she had a black eye. Mr Joynt cross-examined the witness with a view to show that the prosecutrix received the marks of violence from a domestic quarrel, but the husband being sworn denied that this was the case. On the application of Mr Joynt the case was adjourned until this morning, to enable the defendants to call witnesses. Civil Cases—M. M'Phee v Wm. Blaikie, claim £35 10s lOd ; Mr Joynt for plaintiff ; judgment by default for £10 10s lOd and costs £3 78. N. Mennell vS. Simpson, claim £;>f> 4s 3d ; Mr Thomas for plaiutiff, aud Mr Joynt for defendant : judgment for * £31 4s 3d and costs £6 os. G. Grabau v ; Fritz Westphal. claim £37 10s ; Mr Joynt for plaintiff; Mr Thomas for defendant; plaintiff nonsuited, costs £4 12s.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP18730731.2.18.1

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume XXI, Issue 2492, 31 July 1873, Page 3

Word Count
453

CHRISTCHURCH. Press, Volume XXI, Issue 2492, 31 July 1873, Page 3

CHRISTCHURCH. Press, Volume XXI, Issue 2492, 31 July 1873, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert