Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT.

f (Before Charles Broad, Esq., R.M.) Friday, W7. Assaulting Police, st.~ John Mullins, charged with the above offence, at the Casino de Venice, on Monday last, was sentenced to one month's imprisonment with hard labor. Patrick Leach, for a similar offence at the same time and place, was sentenced to 14 days' imprisonment with ' a disturbance at the Casino on Monday night, was / fined 4>)s. John Sl itterv, on a similar charge. / wis dismissed, the ca e not be ing proved. ' O'tsfrHciivtj thr P,'ic.\~Tli mis Fitzpatrick, | ch rgvd with" t'iis offence, was fine.l LlO. Riotous Conduct.—Thomas Rodgers. charged L f with creating a disturbance at the Casino del Venice, on Wedae diy night last, was lined 405., which having failed to psiy, he was imprisoned | | for three days with hard lai>or. L Vuqranctj.—Thoma* Cummings, who was k p r ,vod bv the evidence adduced to be an old of- i tender, was sentenced to three month's imprison- j niei.t. with hard lab >r. \ Asw'di —Ryan v. Pic.—Case dismissed. /IwiM/f.—Hrevin v. Sedgwick.--The assault having been fully proved, his worship inflicted aj fine of L 5, together with costs. JJmnkenneFred rick M'Dowell and T. R.; Bennett for this offence were severally lined 205., j or in default 48 hours' imprisonment. Perjury— Clark v Asper.—The information in fir's ease was di-m' -cd. the complainant having failed to prove the cliaig.'. As•riult.rro''l v Brosinan.—ln this case the j pr oe l. l is Worship sentenced the prisoner to one month's imprisonment with hard ; lal«»r. ! B Perjury—Frederick Cc.rro'l, charged with wil-: I ful and corrupt perjury, ''as remanded till the j instant. Twentv-or.e civil ca c vs were disposed of.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHARG18670504.2.8

Bibliographic details

Charleston Argus, Volume 1, Issue 15, 4 May 1867, Page 3

Word Count
278

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT. Charleston Argus, Volume 1, Issue 15, 4 May 1867, Page 3

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT. Charleston Argus, Volume 1, Issue 15, 4 May 1867, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert