HAPHAZARDNESS
New Zealand is only one of many countries where the advocates of in telligent management of wild life are opposed by various sectional interests. For example, here is some terse comment of Tony Lascelles in 'Nature Magazine' which applies as well to New Zealand as to Canada and the United States of America: "One may justly criticise the three governments ol the prairie piovinces of Canada for permitting an organisation of laymen, untutored in the art of economic biology, to interfere with the management of thcii affairs in the wildlife field. One may question their unconcern re&aidin;4 the dissemination of propaganda sub versive to the ideals of ..cienliic conservation, including an unwairanted demand i'o* inte.Hiye -veimin" control tnat lias \io plu-.e in the agenda of any constructive conservation programme. And what applies to the go-< Mmienrs of the prairie provinces of Canada applies to certain local govern.iicnh> in the United Slates."
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/BPB19391220.2.24
Bibliographic details
Bay of Plenty Beacon, Volume 1, Issue 102, 20 December 1939, Page 6
Word Count
152HAPHAZARDNESS Bay of Plenty Beacon, Volume 1, Issue 102, 20 December 1939, Page 6
Using This Item
Beacon Printing and Publishing Company is the copyright owner for the Bay of Plenty Beacon. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence . This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Beacon Printing and Publishing Company. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.