PROHIBITION
Re. article in Saturday's issue, purporting to he an interview with Sir F. B. Moulden—Tb© article said that; “Advocates of prohibition will iw doubt attempt to contradict these statements.’’ AVe do not see any need to contradict them. Who would believe this man, whose history and interest we do nop know, against the testimony of Lloyd George, or Evangeline Booth? (Published by Arrangement:) added that some strikers jbined the organisation to act as spies, but found that the object of the movement was to uphold loyalty in the event of attempted revolution and provide rallying points, where loyal citizens would find definite proposals for assisting authorities were they taken unaware or overj3owered.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/BOPT19251102.2.25
Bibliographic details
Bay of Plenty Times, Volume LIV, Issue 9024, 2 November 1925, Page 5
Word Count
113PROHIBITION Bay of Plenty Times, Volume LIV, Issue 9024, 2 November 1925, Page 5
Using This Item
NZME is the copyright owner for the Bay of Plenty Times. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons New Zealand BY-NC-SA licence . This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of NZME. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in