R. M. COURT, TAURANGA.
TUESDAY, fpks ii, 1^92. (Befora^. JS, Esq.Jl^);^ Thos Humphreys v. ChasHarley, Claim for £17 3s Harley *.' WnalkaWa recently hearS in Mis court. Each party conducted his owncaaev Defendant I^i&iihte r\jfus4rtb pay; on the ground that plaintiff had not tafteh^ont a certificate this year in accordance' witJj section 44 of the Law Practitioners Act, 1882. The Bench held the defendant liable, it did not cotpider it to be the duty of tneuourtf ifctax solicitors costs and that it had nothiog to do with Mr Humphreys taking out a certificate, this was a. matter conoernlrig 1 the Supreme Court only. Judgment whs given for the full amount and costs 38s. Two or three other unimportant cases were. heard, but they were of no public interest.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/BOPT18920622.2.14
Bibliographic details
Bay of Plenty Times, Issue XX, 22 June 1892, Page 3
Word Count
127R. M. COURT, TAURANGA. Bay of Plenty Times, Issue XX, 22 June 1892, Page 3
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in