Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SOME ADVERSE VIEWS.

(Received January 25, 9.35 a.m.) LONDON, January 24.

Lord Inverclyde, addressing the shipowners' association at Glasgow, asked whether the Government's desii'e to ratify the Declaration of London was not equivalent to an admission that the navy was unable to protect the trade routes. Admiral Wilson was too sanguine regarding the impossibility of invasion. Britain was entitled to command the sea commercially, and the navy must be equal to any necessity. Admiral Fremantle condemns the Declaration, believing that none of the signatories would observe it in wartime. The International Court could have no power to enforce its decision. He is also of opinion that the new blockade rules would much hamper British naval commanders.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/BA19110125.2.15

Bibliographic details

Bush Advocate, Volume XXIII, Issue 20, 25 January 1911, Page 5

Word Count
116

SOME ADVERSE VIEWS. Bush Advocate, Volume XXIII, Issue 20, 25 January 1911, Page 5

SOME ADVERSE VIEWS. Bush Advocate, Volume XXIII, Issue 20, 25 January 1911, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert