Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

MOMENTS OF INTEREST.

, **X— ■ - . . . .. WOMEN WHO FOUGHT DUELS. I In 18S(>, ]Yi.:'.xs Shelley, an American girl, mot Jviuif. Astie de Valsayre, the advocate of woman's rights in France. The young American declared that the women doctors of France were far less' skilled than the American women who have taken i up the study of medicine. One word led to another, until the American at last called the Frenchwoman an idiot. This was too much for the Gallis "blood of Mine, de Valsayre, so she challenged the other to a duel. As the American knew nothing of tho use of foils, her antagonist gave her two week's for practice. The contest took place near Waterloo. Despite the ominous name — ominous for the Frenchwoman — the American girl was defeated, and carried her hand in a slmg for some time. The incident created a great sensation at the time. But duels among women have not been rare in the past. Under Louis XIII. two women of the highest aristocracy, the Marquise de Merles and the Countess de Polignac, had a d« el with pistols in the Bois de Boulogne. The cause was the gallant Duke de Richelieu.; Mmci d'Aubigny, better knovfn as Mile. Maupin, was challenged^, by three cavaliers, who took her, to, be a man. She put all three hors de combat. A diplomatic duel was that in which the Countess Lodiska Trautmannsdorff, a born Pole, was. engaged. It was a tragic affair, indeed. A rival of her husband published an article which ■attempted to make the latter ridiculous. The Count — it was soon after their marriage, in 1893 — discovered that a certain Baron Rapp was the author of the article, aud called him out on the field of honor. A friend of the baron's, with tho count's permission, represented the former in the contest, and killed Count Trautraannsdorff. The count's second then called Baron Rapp himself to account, and in such a manner that the exasperated baron drew his sword and stabbed the second. What was his mortification and chagrin, however, when he discovered that the brave second was the CT>untess Traunnannsdorff, wife of the dead principal. The countess died from the effects of tho wound, and the baron ended his own life from shame.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/BA19050107.2.5

Bibliographic details

Bush Advocate, Volume XVII, Issue 5, 7 January 1905, Page 3

Word Count
374

MOMENTS OF INTEREST. Bush Advocate, Volume XVII, Issue 5, 7 January 1905, Page 3

MOMENTS OF INTEREST. Bush Advocate, Volume XVII, Issue 5, 7 January 1905, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert